Innovative Strategies
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies

Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal



Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated almost 13 years ago on . Most recent reply
Subject-to - seller paying the 2nd mortgage - what should contract look like?
Hi. I am working with a seller on a subject-to deal. Here is the info:
Owes 47k on first (payments = 387/mo PITI)
Owes 7k on second (payments = 90/mo PITI)
The seller has agreed to continue making the payments on the second mortgage.
How do you suggest I write up the agreement with this seller? Should all of the above terms and conditions be solely written in the purchase and sales agreement? Or should there be an additional contract/addendum regarding the seller paying back the 2nd mortgage?
The exit strategy is to assign this contract to a landlord who wants the property as a rental. I want the end buyer (landlord) to be comfortable with the agreement.
Thanks
Most Popular Reply

In my opinion, you purchase the property subject to both mortgages as you do not want the seller to quit paying and running up the tab. Anything could happen, job loss, illness, divorce, etc. Also, if he is paying on a note secured by the property, then he may be able to make a claim to the equity through quiet title suit.
However, there may be a way to structure this and I am building on what Brian already introduced. Here is what I would do:
First, you should agree to pay both mortgages, then create a note for $7K (preferably with some sort of collateral like other real estate, car, coin collection, art, etc.. You will need to the date of origination,loan amount, interest rate, and loan term. Then using a mortgages calculator, recreate the note term by adjusting the term, rate, and balance due until you have a similar note schedule.
Explain to the seller the reason for doing it this way is for legal reasons and for peace of mind. If he is paying you $90 / month and your paying $90 / month to the second mortgage, then the payment is a wash.
This way is much better because you no longer run the risk of the seller making a claim to the equity for payments on the second. Also, if seller stops paying, you will know right away and avoid arrears.
I would not proceed with the above unless you can cash flow if forced to pay the seller's second on your own.
Good Luck!