Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Innovative Strategies
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

35
Posts
5
Votes
Daniel Rutherford
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Wichita, KS
5
Votes |
35
Posts

Subject To Strategy Question

Daniel Rutherford
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Wichita, KS
Posted
I had a question for anyone who has done Subject To deals or is fairly knowledgeable on them. Once you take the title and pay on the existing mortgage, how would you go about changing any escrow terms? Specifically, the homeowners insurance policy would need to be in my name as the deed holder, but that is part of the existing PITI payment. Since the mortgage wouldn’t be in my name, how would I be permitted to change the terms? Would the bank allow a policy that is in a different name than what’s on the mortgage? This is all of course a separate discussion from any Due on Sale clause issues. I’m just curious how anyone has dealt with this in their own dealings. Thanks!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,227
Posts
1,775
Votes
Mitch Messer
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Playa del Carmen, México
1,775
Votes |
2,227
Posts
Mitch Messer
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Playa del Carmen, México
Replied

Hi @Daniel Rutherford. I know of two ways to address this:

  1. Keep the existing policy that's in the borrower's name, and get a new (landlord) policy with your title-holding entity as the insured party.
  2. Get a new (landlord) policy with your title-holding entity as the insured party and the borrower as an additional insured party.

We've done both. Option 2 is cheaper (one premium instead of two). Just make sure your insurance carrier can get it done right.

In either case, you will need to have solid paperwork signed at closing to ensure you have the ability to cash an insurance check if you ever file a claim, namely a limited power-of-attorney from the borrower to your title-holding entity.

Loading replies...