Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Innovative Strategies
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago on .

User Stats

5,544
Posts
2,364
Votes
Jeff B.
  • Buy & Hold Owner
  • Redlands, CA
2,364
Votes |
5,544
Posts

Subject to: risk vs reward?

Jeff B.
  • Buy & Hold Owner
  • Redlands, CA
Posted

Subject to: risk vs reward?

The Contract of Sale, The All Inclusive Wrap, The “Subject To” -- innovative means to begin REI.

As Tom Standen Says:

It could even be argued that selling a property “Subject To” is really not a very smart thing to do.  Just think, you have transferred your ownership interest in the property to someone else (usually someone you do not know); however, you have remained responsible for the underlying loan on the property. If they don’t make the payments, guess whose credit is ruined? You’re right, yours!

No, It’s not a crime.

No, writing a sale on a Wrap Around, a Contract or with a Subject To is not a crime. But the buyer needs to understand, and the seller needs to disclose in the selling agreement, that there is, or may be, a right on the part of the lender to “call” the note due if the property is sold without express written consent of the lender.

See the other risks at this site

[I am not associated with Mr Standen in any way whatsoever]