Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Innovative Strategies
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 1 year ago,

User Stats

16
Posts
10
Votes
Hunter Kahn
10
Votes |
16
Posts

Investing in two locations simultaneously: Innovative strategy or War on two fronts?

Hunter Kahn
Posted

Hello Everybody!

     I've made a couple of posts over on the "Starting out" thread but I'm here looking for some input on a potential strategy that I've recently started working on. I'm new to RE investing and it's been a wild ride with a lot of learning and new contacts in my phone and email. So I'm yet to develop confidence in discerning between a hair-brained idea and a good strategy. What I'm seeking here is guidance from the greater experience of the BP community. Thank you in advance for any help you can offer!

So, here's what I'm thinking. I have two areas in which I'm looking to invest: Kansas City, MO and Boulder, CO. The latter is my own backyard and the former is out-of-state but just close enough to make a road trip to if necessary. I've been in contact with people in both locations around the potential for each city. 

Boulder has low and declining cap rates, but appreciation has been quite admirable and there is a lot of potential for value-add in small multifamily in the area. Now, KC on the other hand has a cap rate that's about 1.0~1.2% higher and it has been rising in recent history. However, appreciation is lower and prices are roughly one-twentieth of what I'm seeing in Boulder. 

With these considerations, I'm considering a double-headed approach. I'm currently actively looking for multifamily properties in both cities. The approach with Boulder is to find a distressed small multifamily (3-4 units) complex that I can rehab and house-hack. Major benefits here are that I can decrease my living expenses and take advantage of the disproportionate appreciation. Simultaneously, I'm looking to get into a larger multifamily (between 6-12ish units) in Kansas City, MO to build up equity faster and get some cash flow as a bonus. After a couple of years, I will move out of the Boulder property, refinance it, and use the additional funding to acquire more property. 

Let me know what you guys think. Is this too much too soon? Ambitious but doable? Or a good idea? Any and all feedback/input is welcome!

Thanks in advance!

Hunter

Loading replies...