Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Innovative Strategies
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

36
Posts
13
Votes
Brady Ascheman
  • New to Real Estate
  • Benson, MN
13
Votes |
36
Posts

Section Two Financing (Pace Morby)

Brady Ascheman
  • New to Real Estate
  • Benson, MN
Posted

Hi everyone, I recently watched the BiggerPockets Podcast (300 Doors ALL Through Creative Financing w/ Pace Morby) I'm on my 5 time watching it trying to comprehend everything that Pace does. I was just curious if anyone on here has bought using section two and taken over the seller mortgage before. Some questions that come to mind. When you do this do you actually pay the bank the mortgage amount or is that still the responsibility of the seller of the home? If the case is that you pay directly to the bank wouldn't the bank find out every single time you did this and call due on sale? If the seller of the home still is the one that pays the mortgage and you just pay the seller then wouldn't you have to worry about the seller not paying the mortgage payments and then the bank would foreclose? Comments would be much appreciated if anyone has experience in this field please connect with me I would love to talk more personally with someone about this. Thanks so much 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

972
Posts
958
Votes
Doug Pretorius
  • Investor
  • Kitchener-Waterloo, Ontario
958
Votes |
972
Posts
Doug Pretorius
  • Investor
  • Kitchener-Waterloo, Ontario
Replied

@Brady Ascheman when taking over payments I've always paid the bank directly. And no in 20 years the bank has never called a loan due. I've physically gone to the seller's bank with the seller, sat down with the manager and told them I'm taking over the payments, and the bank has still not called the loan due.

As an alternative to paying the bank yourself you can use a loan servicing company. You can set it up so they will take the money from your tenant, pay you, pay the bank, pay your insurance, taxes etc.

Never, ever, let the seller take your money and trust that they're going to pay the mortgage. Most of the sellers who agree to a payment takeover deal are horrible with their money. Once they leave the house and are no longer emotionally tied to it, the second they start having new money problems they will spend your money on something else forgetting that the bank is going to foreclose if they do that.

Loading replies...