Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Phoenix Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

117
Posts
50
Votes
Brian Volland
  • Property Manager
  • Peoria, Az
50
Votes |
117
Posts

Odd Multi-Family Marketing

Brian Volland
  • Property Manager
  • Peoria, Az
Posted

So I just wanted to pitch a question to you guys and see if you came up with the same answer I did. I'm seeing a number of MLS listings for fourplexes around the greater Phoenix area which are actually two fourplexes side-by-side. Any reasonable person looking at the property would assume it's an 8-unit apartment on two parcels.

So the question is, why would they break them up in the MLS listing? I imagine it's a very select group the would want to purchase only half of a property that is not meant to be split like that.

The answer I've come up with is valuation. With Phoenix's inflated property values on residential real estate, the owner (or realtor), lists it this way because they can then avoid being valued at using cap rates; now it's just comps.

Thoughts?

Loading replies...