Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Utah Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago,

User Stats

13
Posts
2
Votes
Grant Keaton
  • Salt Lake City, UT
2
Votes |
13
Posts

First Buy and Hold, Mid vs. Low value area?

Grant Keaton
  • Salt Lake City, UT
Posted

Hello friends,

I'm looking to restart my portfolio and wanted to see if anyone had opinion on geographies. Most of my looking has been in Utah and south SL counties, midrange ~200-300k SFHs. Growth is projected at 4-5%, homes typically <20yrs old. However, there are other areas in Utah with significantly lower prices, such as cache valley, west Weber county. I have capital for around a 300k deal. For a buy and hold Do I get more bang for my buck in a lower value area? Or is it all a wash?

Loading replies...