Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Texas Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

151
Posts
5
Votes
Zoe Lee
  • Plano, TX
5
Votes |
151
Posts

Preexisting issue not disclosed by seller

Zoe Lee
  • Plano, TX
Posted

Hi there,


We recently bought a house in Dallas TX. A couple of weeks ago the tenant called about toilet backing up. We sent a couple of contractors there to look into it. They found that the plumbing lines were not installed properly. Tenant also told us this is a recurring issue.

But there is no mentioning in the seller's disclosure.

Has anyone encountered similar issue before? I would like some advice on what options we have at this point. Monetary compensation? lawsuit? rescinding?


Thank you! 

Zoe

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

887
Posts
758
Votes
Jerel Ehlert
  • Attorney
  • Austin, TX
758
Votes |
887
Posts
Jerel Ehlert
  • Attorney
  • Austin, TX
Replied
Back away from the internet.  A little is good, but more makes for a difficult client.
Proving up a seller's failure to disclose is never cut-and-dry as most think.  These cases turn on facts.  What *exactly* was disclosed? What did you sign? Did you have an inspection? When did the issue occur? Is this something the seller *could have known* (or was it hidden to them)?
If the seller never occupied the property, disclosure is much lighter.  And you WOULD have to prove actual knowledge.

Aside from the statutes, case law plays major factor in what really applies to your case.

But the 1st hurdle is to determine ability to recover.  Say you win, and you get a judgement against the seller.  Can they pay?  Homestead is exempt, so are there non-exempt assets?
  • Jerel Ehlert
  • Loading replies...