Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Pennsylvania Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago,

User Stats

3
Posts
0
Votes
Drew Valentine
  • New York City, NY
0
Votes |
3
Posts

PA Tax Deed Question - Bureau Notice Failure

Drew Valentine
  • New York City, NY
Posted

If a bidder at a judicial sale (tax deed) is successful in placing the winning bid and subsequently seeks to quiet title, will that bidder take the property subject to a mortgage / lien if the relevant tax bureau fails to provide notice to the mortgagee or lien holder?  My reading of PA case law (I'm a lawyer but not in PA)  seems to say that if the bureau fails to provide notice, the remedy for the mortgagee / lien holder is that the purchaser takes the property subject to the mortgage / lien and not that the judicial sale is invalidated. The result being that a bidder that avoids this result by not bidding at upset sale ends up in the same position as an upset sale bidder, inadvertently, at no fault of the bidder's and all contrary to the spirit of the written law.  Is this the case?

Loading replies...