Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Off Topic
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago,

User Stats

1
Posts
0
Votes
Maggie Eriksson
  • Hollywood, FL
0
Votes |
1
Posts

CFR Sec 8 portability question

Maggie Eriksson
  • Hollywood, FL
Posted

If a tenant transferring to another H.A. has not found an apartment by the date his first apt.  must be vacated and becomes a hold-over tenant with an extension to look for an apartment in the new jurisdiction, can the first H.A. terminate the tenant and refuse to pay the additional month H.A. share - forcing the tenant into homelessness for a month? In this case, the second H.A. will not be assimilating the tenant; the previous H.A. will be billed. THIS QUESTION IS URGENT. PLEASE GIVE ME CFR CITATION.