Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Off Topic
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 15 years ago, 09/04/2009

User Stats

93
Posts
8
Votes
Tony Thompson
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Kansas CIty, MO
8
Votes |
93
Posts

Big Companies & Big Government

Tony Thompson
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Kansas CIty, MO
Posted

...are like ice cream and cake?

My coworker and I frequently debate the question of:

Is government action necessary to monitor big business, so that the business does not get too powerful and monopolized?

His argument is yes, government needs to intervene; but at the same time not get too involved.

My argument is the reason businesses get too powerful is because of government through lobbying/influence to modify laws that benefit big business.

What do think? Does business need any watch at all from govt? Or is a small amount of watch needed from govt? How involved should the govt be?