Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Off Topic
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 16 years ago, 03/24/2009

User Stats

1,821
Posts
446
Votes
Richard Warren
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Las Vegas, NV
446
Votes |
1,821
Posts

Not So Fast On The Toxic Assets Plan

Richard Warren
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Las Vegas, NV
Posted

The stock market was absolutely giddy after the release of the Obama administration’s plan for toxic assets. However, not everyone is drinking the Kool Aid. Paul Krugman, the Nobel Prize winning NY Times columnist and noted economist, thinks the plan is doomed to fail.

Considering that Professor Krugman is a major Obama supporter and Keynsian economists who believes in big spending by government, this is a signal that all is not right in Obama-land.

From Krugman’s March 22nd column:

Speaking of the plan:

See the article: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/23/opinion/23krugman.html?_r=1

:cool:

Loading replies...