Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Off Topic
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago,

User Stats

8,794
Posts
4,382
Votes
Bryan Hancock#4 Off Topic Contributor
  • Investor
  • Round Rock, TX
4,382
Votes |
8,794
Posts

Where The Real Movement Is Within The Top 1%

Bryan Hancock#4 Off Topic Contributor
  • Investor
  • Round Rock, TX
Posted

I found this article the other day and thought it was worth sharing:

How You, I, and Everyone Got the Top 1 Percent All Wrong

There has been a heightened interest in the top 1% and how they're fairing relative to the rest of the population of late in the aftermath of all of the media coverage about it several years ago.  

What is interesting to me is that very few people realize how different the top 10% of the top 1% is from the lower 90% of the same range.  An even starker contrast is between the top 1% of the top 1% and the next 9% of the top 1%.  

Studies like this are often loaded and I wonder how the analysis would change if you look at wealth differentials over the same time period.  Many of the wealthy folks have paper gains without corresponding "income" to show in the charts.  

Anyway.....I thought this was interesting and worth sharing.  Thoughts and feedback are welcome.  

Loading replies...