Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Illinois Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

36
Posts
15
Votes
Joseph J DiFranco
  • Appraiser
  • Chicago area
15
Votes |
36
Posts

Paying cash, then financing

Joseph J DiFranco
  • Appraiser
  • Chicago area
Posted

Hello all.  I'm appraising a three flat in chicago with an illegal garden unit.  Owner says an old water bill/document shows 3 units but city says two units.  Any thoughts as to the likelihood of getting the city to call it a three unit again?  How common is it for investors to purchase property with an illegal unit, but continue renting.  Or do most go for duplexing the unit.  This property is Humboldt Park/West Wicker Park area of Chicago.

Also, just seems goofy, as the buyer is paying cash for the deal, but after closing, will be obtaining financing.  Is this fishy or common practice?  I never see this, so any commentary is appreciated.  Also seems weird, as the property appears to have sold above market value.

Any thoughts greatly appreciated!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,778
Posts
1,849
Votes
Mike McCarthy
  • Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
1,849
Votes |
2,778
Posts
Mike McCarthy
  • Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
Replied

@Joseph J DiFranco I cant comment much about the 2/3 unit issue. Depends so much on the city and where her it’s just a clerical error.

But on the cash to finance issue, yes, a lot of investors (me included) do that. It makes the purchase process much easier and faster, and makes my offer much more enticing to the seller. Quick close, no worries about a mortgage not being approved, etc.

I usually do some repairs and upgrades to the house, then get financing based on the new appraised value. The mortgage process is still a pain and takes 45-60 days to close, but then I’m in less of a rush, and can often get a higher valuation based on the upgrades and improvements made to the property.

Loading replies...