Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Connecticut Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

179
Posts
199
Votes
Edward Schenkel
  • Attorney
  • Norwalk, CT
199
Votes |
179
Posts

Investing in brick multifamilies

Edward Schenkel
  • Attorney
  • Norwalk, CT
Posted

Is there any disadvantages / advantages to investing in brick multifamilies v. the more traditional types of multifamilies? I am wondering about maintenance, value over time, etc.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

23
Posts
8
Votes
Matt Z.
  • New Haven, CT
8
Votes |
23
Posts
Matt Z.
  • New Haven, CT
Replied

@Edward Schenkel my experience is specific to the space I operate in, which is small mutlifamily in the top tier parts of New Haven:

- Property value for brick will be slightly higher (assuming average or better condition brick)

- Property tax for brick will be a bit higher, all other things equal. Proportionally, the amount of extra tax paid is slightly inflated versus how much extra money you'll make on a sale. 

- You won't get additional monthly rent from brick. But keep in mind...

- ...an attractive house is an attractive house, an ugly house is an ugly house. Rentability and achieving full market rent is easier with an attractive house, even if the interiors are equal. Old brick houses in my area are often very attractive.  Original wood clapboards are if they were maintained.  Siding encapsulations and beat-to-hell wood clapboards tend to be the biggest losers. 

- On old houses, yes, brick will require some maintenance.  Relatively expensive, but also not needed often. But painted clapboard I believe will likely need far more frequent maintenance, though at a lower cost each time. 

- Here's the wildcard: In the areas I operate, many small MF are being converted to Condos or owner-occupied SF.  This can be a quite lucrative exit strategy, or partial exit I suppose if you are going to manage the condo.  Good-condition Brick houses are a candidate for these valuable conversions, as are houses with original wood clapboards with nice detailed trim, also in good condition.  Wood w/ rot and covered in flaking lead paint?  Nah. Vinyl, Aluminum, or Asbestos?  Hell no. 

@Filipe Pereira Any quick suggestions for mortar for minor repointing of a brick + stone foundation?  Late-1800s soft brick.  Care more about not using a too-hard mortar and damaging the brick, more than finding a perfect visual match.  It's all been painted multiple times anyway. 

Loading replies...