Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
New Member Introductions
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

115
Posts
37
Votes
Tony H.
  • Rocklin
37
Votes |
115
Posts

Hello From Newark, CA

Tony H.
  • Rocklin
Posted
Hi BP! My name is Tony from Newark,CA (sf bay area). I am new to the community and I learned a lot! I own a condo in newark and it has been having a nice increases over the years. Just recently i had a thought if tapping into my equity to buy an investment property outside the bay area. The property prices here are outrageous now. I have been thinking to invest in sacramento areas. However, i did a few research, including other suburbs, it looks like there is no way to get at least 1% cash flow. I have 2 goals that I know I can only get one or the other. 1. Get a investment property with a very nice cash flow to help me payoff my primary residence quickly. Or 2. Accept the fact of close to zero cash flow and hope for the best for appreciation. I am still debating between the two, but I am leaning towards goal 1. My reasoning: I am using Heloc that is tied to my primary residence as collateral. If housing market crash, i would lose a lot if not all that and my primary residence will be in "danger". Am i wrong to think this way? What should i do? Thanks BP!

Loading replies...