New Member Introductions
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions
presented by
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
presented by
1031 Exchanges
presented by
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 7 years ago,
Hello From Newark, CA
Hi BP! My name is Tony from Newark,CA (sf bay area). I am new to the community and I learned a lot!
I own a condo in newark and it has been having a nice increases over the years. Just recently i had a thought if tapping into my equity to buy an investment property outside the bay area.
The property prices here are outrageous now. I have been thinking to invest in sacramento areas. However, i did a few research, including other suburbs, it looks like there is no way to get at least 1% cash flow.
I have 2 goals that I know I can only get one or the other.
1. Get a investment property with a very nice cash flow to help me payoff my primary residence quickly.
Or
2. Accept the fact of close to zero cash flow and hope for the best for appreciation.
I am still debating between the two, but I am leaning towards goal 1.
My reasoning:
I am using Heloc that is tied to my primary residence as collateral. If housing market crash, i would lose a lot if not all that and my primary residence will be in "danger".
Am i wrong to think this way?
What should i do?
Thanks BP!