Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
New Member Introductions
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago,

User Stats

4
Posts
0
Votes
Trevor Denningham
  • Founder, TD Capital Partners
  • Fort Worth, TX
0
Votes |
4
Posts

Cincinnati VS. Northern Kentucky for Rental Units???

Trevor Denningham
  • Founder, TD Capital Partners
  • Fort Worth, TX
Posted

Hello BP! I'm looking at building a rental portfolio of 10-50 SFR units in the next few years, with an emphasis on section 8 tenants (I think...??). I have been considering a number of markets in the Midwest but ultimately like what i'm seeing out of this area and the cash flow that is possible. I was wondering if anyone on here has a preference or recommendation as to which of these would be preferable or any one elses take on my whole idea. Thanks for the Help!

Loading replies...