Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
California Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 3 years ago,

User Stats

25
Posts
6
Votes
Adrian Peterson
  • Investor
  • Newport Beach, CA
6
Votes |
25
Posts

Seller can't clear title

Adrian Peterson
  • Investor
  • Newport Beach, CA
Posted

A client was set to purchasing a property in So Cal. They were scheduled to close escrow in a couple days only to discover the seller has a lien on the property for a debt that should've been removed in their bankruptcy 5 years ago. The lienholder cannot be located and Title would not close unless lien is removed. Escrow really dropped the ball since that lien should've been discovered and resolved prior to buyer giving their landlord 'notice to vacate'.

Now Seller is asking for a minimum 30 day extension to try locate lienholder and clear lien however, buyers would have no accommodations to stay in the interim, as their landlord stated they have to be out in 14 days since landlord already filled their vacancy with another tenant and have no other units available. Also, buyer's were informed by their lender that their loan is about to expire so they would have to be approved once again.

Buyer has 3 little girls all in grade school so you can imagine the stress and inconvenience this has caused them. Aside from their EMD, Buyers had paid for appraisal and home inspection costs.

What recourse does Buyer have and what would you suggest?

Loading replies...