Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
California Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago,

User Stats

56
Posts
38
Votes
Henry Murray
  • Investor
  • Redondo Beach, CA
38
Votes |
56
Posts

Should I buy Earthquake Insurance in the LA area?

Henry Murray
  • Investor
  • Redondo Beach, CA
Posted

Hi BP! So I'm looking at buying a duplex in the LA area as a house-hack and I'm wondering what everybody's thoughts are on earthquake insurance?

I have a friend with a couple of small rental properties in the LA area and he doesn't have earthquake insurance on any of them… says it's too expensive and he'd rather take his chances. I also recently talked to a real estate agent who says that her clients (buying $1M+ owner-occupied single-family houses rarely buy earthquake insurance bc they all figure that if something happens it will be so bad FEMA will have to come in and bail us all out anyway.

The way I approach insurance is that I think insurance should be bought for things that I can’t easily replace (ie I don’t buy the missed flight trip insurance from the airlinebut I think that car and homeowner insurance are a necessity bc I’m not in the financial position to just pay my way out if something happens to them or they create a liability). From that mindset it seems a bit irresponsible to not buy earthquake insurance on property in a place that’s known for earthquakes but I also haven't gotten a quote yet to see how expensive it really is. Maybe it is prohibitively expensive, or maybe just nobody has it so we’re all in this under-insured boat together and the federal government will be forced to step in? Or maybe the risk varies significantly depending on exact location so it's kind of a case by case thing, or there are other parts of the story that I’m missing?

If you own property in the LA area, what are your thoughts on earthquake insurance here? Necessity or will we all get bailed out by FEMA? Anyone have any data on what % of properties in the LA area actually have earthquake insurance? Any other parts of the story that I'm missing?

Thanks!

Loading replies...