Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
California Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

4
Posts
2
Votes
Sonia Wu
2
Votes |
4
Posts

[Bay Area] Should I request permits to even uneven floors?

Sonia Wu
Posted

Hi BiggerPockets community!

This is a fairly specific problem. Hopefully someone here can help us out! We recently purchased an old Victorian house in Bay Area, built in 1901. It is a 2 bedrooms and 1 bath with basement. We believe the back of the house is an addition, as it is not built on top of the basement, and the floor has become uneven over time. We want to even the floor up to the same level as main house and are unsure if we should request a permit for it. 

There is no online permit records for this addition. Makes sense, since San Francisco only tracks permits from 1980+, whereas this addition was likely added before 1950s (based on very old pictures). I can't determine if it was permitted work. On one hand, the appraisal and inspection both considers this as part of the official living size of the property. The bathroom and laundry hook are also built there, which I believe should have a plumbing permit. However, it seems to be built with less solid material than the main house and has very obvious tilt (two inches). Are we liable to rebuilt if it is an unpermitted addition or should it be the previous owners? The previous owners held the house for a short amount of time as an investment property. They don't know much about it, didn't do any renovations, so we didn't ask about permits. I do want to do it by the code, but am worried requesting a permit to even the floor will open a can of worms. I am also unsure about legal obligations.

I have heard some conflicting ideas about this, hopefully the BiggerPockets community can provide some insights. Thank you!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

680
Posts
644
Votes
Dustin Allen
  • Real Estate Agent
  • South Lake Tahoe, CA
644
Votes |
680
Posts
Dustin Allen
  • Real Estate Agent
  • South Lake Tahoe, CA
Replied

@Sonia Wu

You should get a permit if you are going to change the underlayment or anything below that.  Generally replacing only flooring does not require a permit unless you have to replace or repair underlayment.

When you get your permit, be sure to keep those photos showing that this addition has been in existence since long before you ever bought the house.  Doing this work with permits will help you a lot on the back end whenever you decide to sell.  You will have to disclose whatever you have done either way and it goes over much better when you can say it was permitted and inspected as done properly.

Best of luck, I hope it turns out to be an easy fix.

  • Dustin Allen
  • Loading replies...