Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
California Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

7
Posts
0
Votes
Jeff D.
0
Votes |
7
Posts

Selling a house with a current one year lease

Jeff D.
Posted

A neighbor wants to buy our California rental property in the city of Watsonville. We just signed up a new family for a one-year lease.  The potential buyer says they will "assume" the lease for its term.   

If we do sell, does this require the tenant to sign a new lease?  

One concern is that if they don't sign a new lease (or refuse), and the new owner breaks some provision of the lease or a landlord tenant law, we might be liable. 

If it matters, the lease is between the tenants and our business name (a fictitious business name, not a registered corp or an LLC), but signed by us.

Thanks for any wisdom. 

Loading replies...