Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
California Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

47
Posts
16
Votes
Jim T.
  • Ventura County, CA
16
Votes |
47
Posts

California Rent Gouging Laws

Jim T.
  • Ventura County, CA
Posted

In late 2017, Governor declared a few counties in California "Disaster Areas" and CPC 396 comes into play forbidding rent increases exceeding 10% for the 30 days after the declaration. According to CPC 396, it can be extended up to 6 months. Well, Governor Newsom extended it at the end of 2018 for another year and just extended it for yet another year (until December 2020). 

The wording of this ordinance seems to say the rent can't be raised above 10% above where it wss before the disaster was called. It seems CA is using this as some sort of rent control by prohibiting increases that total over 10% for the entire 2+ years (and counting) years. 

Is my assumption correct? 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

100
Posts
53
Votes
Elizabeth Goff
  • Investor
  • Napa, CA
53
Votes |
100
Posts
Elizabeth Goff
  • Investor
  • Napa, CA
Replied

@Jim T. I was wondering about that too and in fact there are many things about this law that are unclear to me!  I actually have reached out to the Attorney General's office to gain clarification on (1) the date of the price base (2017 or more recent declaration in Oct 2019), (2) what increase in expenses can be added on top (property taxes, maintenance, etc), and (3) length of lease for which this applies.  I'm finding there are a range of interpretations of the law (and I'm currently in battle with my PM about it). It seems it was confirmed in a letter from the AG to the Nor Cal Assoc of Realtors in 2017 (see link) that it is only for units with initial leases of a year or less, which I think is huge for landlords.  So if your initial lease with the tenant was over a year I think you should be fine (mine is 12.5 months, perfect). And I think for new leases, as long as those are OVER a year, it does not apply.  (That said, this post does not constitute legal advice, ha ha, but I think a letter from the AG is about as good as it gets!)  My thought and fear is that the 'state of emergency' will probably keep on getting extended indefinitely as we are going to keep on having fires every year, unfortunately.... so important to understand and fight if possible (especially if the price base is set at 2017). I will keep you posted on what I find out.

https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press_releases/10-16-17%20North%20Bay%20Assn%20of%20Realtors_Anti-Price%20Gouging%20Letter%20from%20the%20AG.pdf

Loading replies...