Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
California Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

300
Posts
205
Votes
Nicholas Lohr
  • Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
205
Votes |
300
Posts

Eviction in CA with a building in a LLC must be done by lawyer?

Nicholas Lohr
  • Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
Posted

I have a commercial 6-plex that is in the name of a LLC. I just went the courthouse to try and file an eviction for non payment of rent and someone there told me that I HAVE to have it done by a lawyer because it's in the name of a corporation. However I got the impression that she might be mistaken.

I then contacted an eviction attorney and she also said it must be done by a lawyer for the same reason.   But it occurs to me that of course a lawyer might say that in order to get the business.

Anyone know if it's required I use a lawyer as they say?

  • Nicholas Lohr
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    5,116
    Posts
    5,171
    Votes
    Kyle J.
    • Rental Property Investor
    • Northern, CA
    5,171
    Votes |
    5,116
    Posts
    Kyle J.
    • Rental Property Investor
    • Northern, CA
    Replied

    They're correct. Think of a LLC, or a corporation, as a separate legal entity with the power of an artificial person according to the law (i.e. enter into contracts, bring a lawsuit, etc). If you were to go into court as a non-attorney and represent that LLC or corporation, you'd essentially be representing another "person" in court and therefore practicing law without a license. You can represent yourself (in pro per) without being licensed, but not someone else.

    Here's a few links on the topic:

    https://nathanmubasher.wordpress.com/2017/02/20/a-corporation-cannot-represent-itself-in-court-in-california/

    https://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/does-an-llc-need-to-be-represented-in-an-unlawful--367580.html

    https://kaass.com/california-corporations-facing-lawsuit-must-be-represented-by-an-attorney/

    https://www.occourts.org/self-help/landlordtenant/preparingyourcomplaint.html (this one is specifically about filing Unlawful Detainer complaints and says "If the plaintiff is a corporation, they must be represented by an attorney.")

    Loading replies...