Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
California Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

8
Posts
3
Votes
Zhenya Levchenko
  • Los Angeles, CA
3
Votes |
8
Posts

Los Angeles - Tenant's "guest" for an extended period of time

Zhenya Levchenko
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

I have a duplex in a rent controlled part of Los Angeles. I live in one unit and rent the other. My tenant recently broke up with her boyfriend (who WAS on the lease but got removed through and addendum) and is now dating another guy. She is a good tenant and pays on time. She can afford to pay on her own, but Los Angeles rent rates are very high even for Boyle Heights where I am.

She previously mentioned a possibility of a roommate and we agreed she would let me know if there is a need. Now there is a new guy who she said is "staying there for the time being". what are the consequences of me NOT having him on the lease?


If she pays the bills and is responsible for the property, I am okay with having just her on the lease. She is an up and coming musician (known) and I feel comfortable with her being solely responsible. What I don't want is: adding some guy onto the lease, them breaking up when the lease is up and they are on a month-to-month, her leaving and me being stuck with a potentially bad tenant. In Los Angeles, this could be a nightmare.


I know that the rule of thumb is to have every occupant documented, but what about in LA? If I don't accept rent from that guy and have no documents, he has no rights to the rental. Are there any negative consequences to this? Can I simply list him and an occupant if I have to?


Thank you for your input in advance.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

5,116
Posts
5,171
Votes
Kyle J.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Northern, CA
5,171
Votes |
5,116
Posts
Kyle J.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Northern, CA
Replied

You should be screening anyone who is going to live there otherwise you're asking for trouble. 

Your statement about "If I don't accept rent from that guy and have no documents, he has no rights to the rental" is not accurate.  If someone is living in the property with your permission, whether or not they are named on the lease, they have a right to be there.  In fact, if your tenant later moved out after this new guy established residency by living there, and if the guy refused to move out with her, you would have to go through a formal eviction to remove him - just like you would any other tenant. 

That's why I said you should be screening anyone who is going to be living in your property BEFORE they move in.  You need to know what type of person will be living there so they don't become a problem later on.

Loading replies...