Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
California Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
Virginia H.
  • Los Angeles, CA
0
Votes |
2
Posts

Am I liable for damages after the house has been sold?

Virginia H.
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

Spring of 2017 I had two bathrooms for a single story rental (in CA) remodeled. Changed out the tub, shower head, piping, valve, lights, toilet, sink/cabinet -cosmetic update. The person I hired to do the work said everything was working properly and there were no leaks for a few days. So they went ahead and put up the sheet rock walls and tile, paint and finished the bathrooms. The house was vacant for 5 months or so. The house was sold in October 2017.

Last month (March 2018), the new owner reached out to my agent and said that the workmanship of the remodel was crappy and caused the leak behind the walls, and created mold to grow. They said they have been dealing with the issue since January and just now reaching out to me (two weeks ago).  I had no knowledge there was a leak or any mold in the house prior to selling the house. I disclosed the bathrooms were remodeled. (The house was rented out for 7 years prior without any issues.)

The new owners said they are giving me a chance to make things right. My agent asked me to put myself in the new owners shoes and advised that I consider helping out with damage costs and come up with agreement that I am not responsible for any future liabilities at that house. I do not feel I am liable for the damages at all. If I help out, even if it is only $1 or $2k doesn't that admit I am at fault? Am I liable because I hired the contractor that didn't have a contractor's license? Please advise what my options are to make it right for them.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,316
Posts
4,459
Votes
Mike Cumbie
Agent
  • REALTOR®
  • Brockport, NY
4,459
Votes |
3,316
Posts
Mike Cumbie
Agent
  • REALTOR®
  • Brockport, NY
ModeratorReplied

Disclaimer: I am not licensed in your state and my recommendation would be to consult an attorney who specializes in Real Estate law in your state.

That being said. How does "No" sound? For all you know they were taking showers with no fan and mold started to grow. If you disclosed any issues you knew about in good faith then I can't see how in the world you are liable for their house 7 months after you sold it. They had a due diligence period and if you were not "hiding" anything. Now if you knew there was an issue then get out your checkbook. I am sure someone at some time offered them a home warranty which they politely refused. 

Just my 2 cents and good luck! I am fairly certain that it is buyer beware (Although I don't know California). I have had clients come up with all sorts of stuff days after closing and my answer has always been the same. That's why you have a due diligence period. 

  • Mike Cumbie

Loading replies...