Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
California Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago, 05/07/2016

User Stats

112
Posts
34
Votes
Geo Tan
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Los Angeles, CA
34
Votes |
112
Posts

One $$$ Property VS Multiple $ Properties

Geo Tan
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

So just to give an update on where this REI journey is taking me.

My recent gains has allowed me to be able to do a down payment of $600k-$800k which has now allowed me to look at properties from the $2mm-$3mm.

It's still the same concept but wanted to see if there was any difference now that the numbers have changed.

So for example let's say I have $700k to play with and am looking at two routes, purchasing one 2.5mm to 3mm dollar property or getting two 600k properties all in Los Angeles.

If all properties in this example are duplexes for the sake of simplicity, I still think it's a better move to go with the two duplexes that are 600k each and pay over 50% down in order to cash flow well and still earn the appreciation incentives of Los Angeles (Which if my memory serves me correctly, was somewhere around 5-6%). I'll have paid off the mortgages on the two properties much faster than the 1 expensive property since I have cash flow to supplement the mortgage payments if needed. It also seems much easier to rent out a space that's much more affordable for the residents of Los Angeles.

I get the whole part of using OPM is better but I still feel like this would be an obvious choice with less risk?

Am I missing something here?

Loading replies...