Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
California Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

42
Posts
56
Votes
Wendy Stclair
  • Investor
  • Long Beach, CA
56
Votes |
42
Posts

1031 Exchange out of California clawback laws -best practices

Wendy Stclair
  • Investor
  • Long Beach, CA
Posted

Hi

I'm in the middle of a 1031 exchange out of Cali and trying to minimize how much hassle i bring into my life with this "clawback law"  My thinking is this... can anyone confirm? If i leverage myself as much as possible and buy 6 or so multiple properties paying just the minimal downpayment, I will have many properties i eventually need to pay California tax on.  But if I just get 3 properties (of course with the required equity and boot numbers) i could buy just 3, one mainly with cash. That last one i would own outright and that would satisfy my exchange right? Then to make that money work for me later,  (maybe even soon if i wanted) i could cash out refi that property and buy more properties that would NOT be subject to the exchange.  is this flawed thinking?  thanks for any insights!  

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

290
Posts
325
Votes
Al D.
  • Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
325
Votes |
290
Posts
Al D.
  • Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
Replied

@Linda West First of all, kudos to your CPA for at least being aware of the requirement since 2014. Chris is correct - it is Form FTB 3840, not federal. I’ve had to provide some of the below evidence to an EA and a CPA - as well as numerous CA investors - who had not been aware of the issue, before they would believe me:

https://www.ftb.ca.gov/about-ftb/newsroom/tax-news/February-2021/compliance-effort-for-FTB-3840-california-like-kind-exchanges-letters-continues.html

https://www.caltax.com/news/podcast/podcast-who-is-responsible-for-filing-form-3840-after-a-like-kind-exchange/

Loading replies...