Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
California Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

42
Posts
57
Votes
Wendy Stclair
  • Investor
  • Long Beach, CA
57
Votes |
42
Posts

1031 Exchange out of California clawback laws -best practices

Wendy Stclair
  • Investor
  • Long Beach, CA
Posted

Hi

I'm in the middle of a 1031 exchange out of Cali and trying to minimize how much hassle i bring into my life with this "clawback law"  My thinking is this... can anyone confirm? If i leverage myself as much as possible and buy 6 or so multiple properties paying just the minimal downpayment, I will have many properties i eventually need to pay California tax on.  But if I just get 3 properties (of course with the required equity and boot numbers) i could buy just 3, one mainly with cash. That last one i would own outright and that would satisfy my exchange right? Then to make that money work for me later,  (maybe even soon if i wanted) i could cash out refi that property and buy more properties that would NOT be subject to the exchange.  is this flawed thinking?  thanks for any insights!  

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

291
Posts
325
Votes
Al D.
  • Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
325
Votes |
291
Posts
Al D.
  • Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
Replied

@Linda West First of all, kudos to your CPA for at least being aware of the requirement since 2014. Chris is correct - it is Form FTB 3840, not federal. I’ve had to provide some of the below evidence to an EA and a CPA - as well as numerous CA investors - who had not been aware of the issue, before they would believe me:

https://www.ftb.ca.gov/about-ftb/newsroom/tax-news/February-2021/compliance-effort-for-FTB-3840-california-like-kind-exchanges-letters-continues.html

https://www.caltax.com/news/podcast/podcast-who-is-responsible-for-filing-form-3840-after-a-like-kind-exchange/

Loading replies...