Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

22
Posts
5
Votes
Louis Barkhuizen
  • Investor
  • Austin, TX
5
Votes |
22
Posts

Analysis paralysis - condo/townhome vs SFR

Louis Barkhuizen
  • Investor
  • Austin, TX
Posted

Hello there guys and gals. I have been evaluating potential properties for STR in Port Aransas Texas, and have found two routes to go. Buy an SFR with no HOA to deal (ballpark SFR cost in Port A is around $400K), or buy a condo/townhome (ballpark cost in Port A around $290K)

From pouring over AirDNA data I see the SFR's on average earn slightly more revenue than condo/townhomes, but not a significant difference.

My ROI and CAP will be much better with the condo/townhome, and I can use the remaining funds to buy a second SFR :)

So my question is: is it worth dealing with potentially problematic HOAs in communities where SFR are allowed (eg. not taking care of deferred maintenance, or lackluster landscaping, etc). I have been advised by fellow investors to stay away from condos or townhomes.

Thanks for any replies.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

159
Posts
127
Votes
Keith Courtney
  • Real Estate Brokerage/Vacation Homes/Short Term Vacation Home Rental Marketing
  • Orlando, FL
127
Votes |
159
Posts
Keith Courtney
  • Real Estate Brokerage/Vacation Homes/Short Term Vacation Home Rental Marketing
  • Orlando, FL
Replied

Louis -

I am not familiar at all with your market, as I deal exclusively with short term rental vacation homes here in Central Florida in the Disney World area.  However, what I have witnessed here may help you with your market.

I try to guide investors away from condos here because they are more difficult and more expensive to finance.  There also is not a lot you can do to them to make them stand out against the competition.

Since townhouses are financed like SFHs, they are much easier and cheaper to finance. They normally are more profitable than condos as a rental, but you are still limited to what you can do to a townhouse to make it unique and stand out against the competition.

SFHs are the best option here because of ease and cost of financing and the potential for profit.  The most profitable rentals here convert the garages into air conditioned movie theaters or game rooms, which obviously you can't do with a condo or townhouse. And, usually a home has other common areas where other fun amenities can be added to the home (i.e. large tvs with Xbox and PlayStation).  I have found that many vacationers who come here will pay more per night and rent a home more often when a home has been renovated and loaded with of these types of fun amenities.

Good luck with whatever you decide.

Keith

  • Keith Courtney
  • Loading replies...