Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

74
Posts
63
Votes
James Palassis
  • Easley, SC
63
Votes |
74
Posts

Rules surrounding vacation rental financing

James Palassis
  • Easley, SC
Posted

I am considering purchasing a short term rental in an area that would see traffic 10 months out of the year. My question involves the financing of the deal. I have the deed to my primary home. Am I able to finance the vacation rental as a primary residence? Are there rules stating I must live in the rental a minimum number of nights for it to be considered owner occupied or primary residence? This property will be less than an hour away from my primary residence, so if it is a matter of my having to stay at the vacation rental a certain number of nights per year, I have no problem doing that. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

9,934
Posts
10,788
Votes
Chris Mason
  • Lender
  • California
10,788
Votes |
9,934
Posts
Chris Mason
  • Lender
  • California
ModeratorReplied

"Second Home" criteria, per Fannie Mae.

Two reasons this might be more appealing than buying it as an investment property:

The intent is basically a vacation home. Your family goes skiing there two weeks a year, that sort of thing. It's got to pass a "common sense" test on that level. Some huge percentage of mortgage folks in the Bay Area, for example, own second homes in Lake Tahoe -- a beautiful area about a 4 hour drive away that you can ski during the winter, and water ski / camp / hike / etc during the summer. That's an example where it pretty clearly falls within the intent and letter of Fannie's guidelines. 

Urban area a 45 minute drive away? Probably not so much.

You can see from the little (1) footnote that Fannie is OK with rental income when your family isn't using it, we just can't use it as mortgage qualifying income the way we normally can with rental income. That, in part, is why Fannie Mae is ok with 90% LTV and a non-investor interest rate: your other sources of income must be able to support both your primary housing, and the second home, so it's not as risky as my trademarked little "unemployed spouses with minimal consumer debt in their name qualifying based purely on rental income" thing to let a married REI get from Fannie's normal cap of 10, to 20.

  • Chris Mason
  • Loading replies...