Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

88
Posts
38
Votes
Ryan Taylor
38
Votes |
88
Posts

To Fee or Not to Fee

Ryan Taylor
Posted

Question for the people in the room that are smarter than me.

I haven't seen this topic come up, or I have just missed it. When it comes to STR's and the numbers work (CoC, Cap rate, etc.) but the property is Lease Hold vs. Fee Simple, would you still move forward as a prospect. Have you come across any issues when trying to, later on down the road, sell said property if acquired. Are LH properties less desirable due to the lease payments, even though the "numbers" work?

If you are ok with LH, are you underwriting it the same way as a fee simple, just factoring in the lease portion of the payment as an expense to make sure you are still achieving your Cap rate.

I know that LH and FS are just ways that you "own" the property, Fee Simple being the highest form of ownership, Lease Hold not owning the land, but wasn't sure if it mattered how you own the property as long as the "numbers" worked. To me it would...am I wrong...

What say you??

  • Ryan Taylor
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    28,167
    Posts
    41,256
    Votes
    Nathan Gesner
    • Real Estate Broker
    • Cody, WY
    41,256
    Votes |
    28,167
    Posts
    Nathan Gesner
    • Real Estate Broker
    • Cody, WY
    ModeratorReplied
    Quote from @Ryan Taylor:

    Question for the people in the room that are smarter than me.

    I haven't seen this topic come up, or I have just missed it. When it comes to STR's and the numbers work (CoC, Cap rate, etc.) but the property is Lease Hold vs. Fee Simple, would you still move forward as a prospect. Have you come across any issues when trying to, later on down the road, sell said property if acquired. Are LH properties less desirable due to the lease payments, even though the "numbers" work?

    If you are ok with LH, are you underwriting it the same way as a fee simple, just factoring in the lease portion of the payment as an expense to make sure you are still achieving your Cap rate.

    I know that LH and FS are just ways that you "own" the property, Fee Simple being the highest form of ownership, Lease Hold not owning the land, but wasn't sure if it mattered how you own the property as long as the "numbers" worked. To me it would...am I wrong...

    What say you??


    I'm curious who owns this and what they allow. I have properties in my area that are lease hold with US Forest Service or some other entity and they do not permit rentals of any kind.

    Regardless, I wouldn't be interested unless I own the property.

    • Nathan Gesner
    business profile image
    The DIY Landlord Book
    4.7 stars
    167 Reviews

    Loading replies...