Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

158
Posts
143
Votes
Wes M.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Southeastern, NC
143
Votes |
158
Posts

NC Court Ruling -- Wilmington STRs Can Still be Regulated

Wes M.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Southeastern, NC
Posted

A ruling has finally been issued for NC Court of Appeals case involving the City of Wilmington's STR ordinance. Ultimately, the court found portions of the City's ordinance to be invalid. Specifically, the City's requirement for "registration" and "lottery" of STRs was found to be invalid. Some may read the news headlines regarding this decision as an unequivocal prohibition of STR regulations in North Carolina, but that is not the case. If your read the entire decision and opinion, the Court affirms local government authority to regulation STRs through zoning enabling legislation. Effectively, any local government in North Carolina still has the authority to prohibit STRs in certain zoning districts as it so chooses. I would anticipate the City of Wilmington will modify their existing ordinance to remove the term "registration" from its existing ordinance in accord with the court's ruling and continue to regulate STRs in certain zoning districts -- but that's just my opinion.

Barring future legislative action by the General Assembly to explicitly preempt local government zoning regulation of STRs, it appears this court ruling will have little effect on existing STR ordinances throughout North Carolina. Few North Carolina local governments use the term "registration" in their ordinance, which is the reasoning for court invalidation in this particular case.

I share this information in an effort to help educate NC STR investors on their future decisions. In my opinion, it would be unwise to invest in an STR location that has existing regulations in place under the assumption this court case has somehow preempted that authority.

Language from Court opinion:

We hold that the following provisions of the ordinance are not preempted by Section 160D-1207(c) and remain in effect: (1) the restriction of whole-house lodging to certain zoning districts, i.e., the entirety of Sec. 18-331.1.

https://www.wect.com/2022/04/0...

Loading replies...