Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

28,053
Posts
41,046
Votes
Nathan Gesner
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Cody, WY
41,046
Votes |
28,053
Posts

L.A. Creates New Law, Bans Tenant Harrassment

Nathan Gesner
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Cody, WY
ModeratorPosted

https://www.latimes.com/califo...

Here are some interesting activities that will be banned, along with my comments:

Deceiving residents about whether they are required to move out (what is "deceit"? If I tell a tenant they have to move out because there are too many noise violations, is that "deceitful" because I didn't instruct them on all their options? Are we getting to the point where I have to give them legal advice? Do I have to tell them they can legally stop paying rent and I can't evict them because of the moratorium?)

Trying to coerce a tenant to leave by offering them payment (say good-bye to "cash for keys")

Revealing the immigration status of a tenant to others or threatening to do so
(If I cross the border to any advanced country in the world, including Mexico, I can be arrested and deported because it's a crime. Now it's illegal to report a crime?)

Failing to follow standards to protect renters from asbestos, dust, lead paint and other health hazards (dust? So if my neighbor is working on his house or the city is working on the streets, it's my responsibility to tent the house? What's next? Holding the umbrella for them as they walk to their car in the rain?)

Refusing to acknowledge or accept lawful payments of rent
(real example: tenant cuts off communication and doesn't pay rent for five months so Landlord starts eviction process. Tenant shows up with full payment to catch up. This law would force the Landlord to accept it which removes the justification for eviction and it can all start over again.)

These cities/states continue to create more regulations to protect bad renters. I can't recall a single law created to punish tenants that fail to pay rent, shut off communication, sneak in three dogs or six family members, physically destroy a property, etc. Government is almost always on the side of the bad guy.

    • Nathan Gesner
    business profile image
    The DIY Landlord Book
    4.7 stars
    165 Reviews

    Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    7,610
    Posts
    9,496
    Votes
    Bill B.#1 Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice Contributor
    • Investor
    • Las Vegas, NV
    9,496
    Votes |
    7,610
    Posts
    Bill B.#1 Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice Contributor
    • Investor
    • Las Vegas, NV
    Replied

    Yup, that would eliminate rental houses for sure Stephen. Get all those people who can’t afford to buy houses back in to government owned apartments. The drug dealing, meth making tenant  with a pet horse that plays his music at full blast 24 hours a day and hasn’t paid in 6 months. That his neighbors problem.  Make the good tenants suffer along with the bad. 

    You forgot to say late fees limited to $1 or we’ll have to have that lawsuit later how a $100 late fee on $2,000 rent is insane even though the government, the mortgage companies snd even the utility companies charge a higher percentage rate. You also forgot you have to sell the house to the tenant for “whatever they can afford” since they obviously wouldn’t be able to buy the house for what it’s worth or they already would have, and “that’s only fair.”

    But I especially love number 9  literally violating the bill of rights by taking 100’s of billions, maybe trillions from landlords without compensation. 

    Ps. I assume you were joking but I just wanted to make it obvious for everyone else. 

    Loading replies...