Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

25
Posts
2
Votes
Tyco Bronye
  • Minneapolis, MN
2
Votes |
25
Posts

Landlord question

Tyco Bronye
  • Minneapolis, MN
Posted

I have a friend here in Minneapolis who purchased a triplex in 2007 by a college to rent out. They had it about 2 years then let it go into foreclosure because the house was worth less than the amount owed on the mortgage in other words "underwater" . I can't understand it because the rents never changed, only the selling price of the house. If you never intend on selling the house why would you care what the house is currently worth on the market?

Yes I understand equity and that he couldn't get equity loans but he had no intention of doing this. His only response it "it's underwater"

Is there something I'm missing?

He's a guy that wanted to be rich through land lording. Now a foreclosure took him out of the real estate game entirely or so he thinks. It seems like that bubble bursting in 2008 would have been a good thing for him because he could have bought his next rental house for less money.

Any thoughts on this?

Loading replies...