Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

209
Posts
47
Votes
Andrew O.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • San Clemente, CA
47
Votes |
209
Posts

Tenant in place, well below market rent. Options?

Andrew O.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • San Clemente, CA
Posted

Hi all,

I need the brains trust together on this one. I am looking at a rental. The owner who inherited the house awhile back wasn't quite sure what to do, so she leased it at $500 a month, market is $1400-1500 a month. The lease is for a year, just signed a month ago.

Apparently tenant says they will vacate for $2000, I just don't see why they would. Is there any recourse for a ridiculously low lease on a house that was sold soon after? The house is a great deal, but I don't want the tenant dramas to ruin it for me. Even if they signed an agreement to be out by a certain date, how enforceable is that in CA? Would I still be in for a full eviction if they changed their mind? Could they just reneg on the agreement to vacate?

Thoughts?

Andrew

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

116
Posts
44
Votes
Fran Flanagan
  • Investor
  • North Wales, PA
44
Votes |
116
Posts
Fran Flanagan
  • Investor
  • North Wales, PA
Replied

Tom Goans, I think you may have mis-read the direction that the $2000 would be flowing. Andrew would be paying the tenant to leave so that he could re-list the property for closer to market rent with a new tenant.

Loading replies...