Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 4 years ago,

User Stats

16
Posts
1
Votes
Liam McGoldrick
  • Investor
  • East Coast
1
Votes |
16
Posts

Insuring away capex to reduce cashflow fluctuations

Liam McGoldrick
  • Investor
  • East Coast
Posted

Hello all,

I am currently in the process of acquiring a rental property, and hope to have one within the next 6 months. With this, I have been thinking a lot about costs, especially capex. Costs that come up unexpectedly really make cashflow estimates messy, and I wonder if it is possible to convert them to more regular costs via insurance. I know this is already something that is required and common, but I wonder what the limitations are to this. In essence, how far could this be taken to the extreme?

When I think of capex, I think of the roof, appliances, plumbing, electrical, water heater, HVAC and other big ticket items that could have issues and rack up a big bill. Is there any reason I could not simply insure everything that could possibly lead to capex? I imagine this would be costly, but is there reason to believe it would be more costly than the capex itself? 

I know there will still be unknowns that cause fluctuations in income, but taking out the largest spikes seems to me a really appealing idea. 

Any thoughts?

Loading replies...