Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

69
Posts
18
Votes
Sean Yang
  • Investor
  • San Diego, CA
18
Votes |
69
Posts

Landlord Insurance Loss-of-use Question

Sean Yang
  • Investor
  • San Diego, CA
Posted

Hi All, 

We had a water damage (kitchen faucet leak) in my rental and opened a claim under my landlord policy. Tenants also opened a claim with their renter's policy. Tenants are currently staying in a hotel while the repair work is being done (hotel cost is paid by their renter's policy). The kitchen has been demolished but the rest of the house is fine. Tenants haven't paid me rent since the accident. Water leak happened on Dec-01, but the repair work didn't start until Jan-04, which was also the date that kitchen was demolished and tenants were displaced into a hotel. 

I was asking the adjuster for the loss-of-use (rent), but he denied it. He said as tenants were already covered for their living expenses by their renter's policy, they should pay me rent and therefore I don't get the loss-of-use from my side. However, I was told by the restoration company that usually in cases like this, I should waive the rent for the duration of the repair because tenants were not staying in the unit. Has anybody here had similar issues? and should I fight for loss-of-use(rent) with my adjuster? He did pay for the water mitigation and kitchen rebuilt by the way, but just not the loss-of-use portion. 

Thanks a ton!!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,175
Posts
1,204
Votes
John Mocker#1 Insurance Contributor
  • Insurance Agent
  • Norwalk, CT
1,204
Votes |
2,175
Posts
John Mocker#1 Insurance Contributor
  • Insurance Agent
  • Norwalk, CT
Replied

Sean,

Does your lease prevent you from charging the Tenants if the house can not be occupied after a set period of time?  If so, you would be suffering a loss of rents.   Send the lease to the adjuster and see if that solves the issue.  

You need to get your agent involved in this loss.  Even though they can not adjust the loss they can help to make sure you are getting the info you need to get this settled correctly.

Loading replies...