Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 4 years ago,

User Stats

38
Posts
15
Votes
Matthew McMenamin
  • Investor
  • Indianapolis & San Diego
15
Votes |
38
Posts

Rental Properties on a Pond

Matthew McMenamin
  • Investor
  • Indianapolis & San Diego
Posted

Is the liability of "waterfront" property worth it for long-term SF rentals? I'm looking at a house in Indianapolis that has one of those suburban-type ponds in the backyard, so we're not talking about swimmable lakefront property. I would imagine some renters with kids would not want to rent somewhere that has an open body of water where their kids might get injured/drown. It provides a nice view off the back porch, but I'm wondering if I should just steer clear of the risk. 

Loading replies...