Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago,

User Stats

19
Posts
10
Votes
Shawn Stiteler
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Vineland, NJ
10
Votes |
19
Posts

Why do all Residence need to be on lease?

Shawn Stiteler
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Vineland, NJ
Posted

Hello Bigger Pockets Family,

I am a newer investor and have a question. I did my first BRRRR deal recently and got the place rented in July. The tenet was a single guy and had a great profile from all the screening. He is a disabled vet and gets full VA benefits and SS that is more than 3 times the rent and set up auto pay for rent on the 3rd of every month. He so far has kept the place in great condition, and has even spent about $500 on landscaping items to make the exterior even nicer. All in all an exceptional tenant and I feel very blessed to have him as my first tenant.

However here is the dilemma. During the screening process he mentioned that his niece would be staying at the house for the first few weeks to get him all settled in. However it’s been about four months now and the niece is practically living there. The tenant moved from New York to South Jersey, he claims he needs his niece to help do the shopping and cooking and such and that she only stays there about four or five days a week and spends the rest of her time in New York. I know from reading the books and generally following bigger pockets it’s important to have everyone who’s living there on the lease. When I asked them about adding the niece to the lease I got a lot of resistance stating that because she’s on a lease in New York she can’t be on the lease here. I don’t want to rock the boat and upset the tenant because everything has been great thus far. However I’m hoping to find out exactly why it’s so important to have the residences on the lease. The tenant clearly qualifies with income and everything else by himself. I just want to make sure I’m not missing some liability aspect.

Any advice would be great. Thank!

Loading replies...