General Landlording & Rental Properties
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 4 years ago,
Why do all Residence need to be on lease?
Hello Bigger Pockets Family,
I am a newer investor and have a question. I did my first BRRRR deal recently and got the place rented in July. The tenet was a single guy and had a great profile from all the screening. He is a disabled vet and gets full VA benefits and SS that is more than 3 times the rent and set up auto pay for rent on the 3rd of every month. He so far has kept the place in great condition, and has even spent about $500 on landscaping items to make the exterior even nicer. All in all an exceptional tenant and I feel very blessed to have him as my first tenant.
However here is the dilemma. During the screening process he mentioned that his niece would be staying at the house for the first few weeks to get him all settled in. However it’s been about four months now and the niece is practically living there. The tenant moved from New York to South Jersey, he claims he needs his niece to help do the shopping and cooking and such and that she only stays there about four or five days a week and spends the rest of her time in New York. I know from reading the books and generally following bigger pockets it’s important to have everyone who’s living there on the lease. When I asked them about adding the niece to the lease I got a lot of resistance stating that because she’s on a lease in New York she can’t be on the lease here. I don’t want to rock the boat and upset the tenant because everything has been great thus far. However I’m hoping to find out exactly why it’s so important to have the residences on the lease. The tenant clearly qualifies with income and everything else by himself. I just want to make sure I’m not missing some liability aspect.
Any advice would be great. Thank!