Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 12 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

35
Posts
4
Votes
Christian Austin
  • Medford, MA
4
Votes |
35
Posts

Purchasing first multifamily as live-in landlord

Christian Austin
  • Medford, MA
Posted

Hello all at biggerpockets. This is my first post, besides an introduction. I'm looking forward to hearing feedback from the experienced.

I am currently looking to make my first real estate purchase. I plan on buying a multifamily property as a live-in landlord. I have many questions, but the most pressing question I have is what would be a smart investment strategy: I am considering two options. Purchase of a two family with future expansion possibilities in an attic or basement (unfortunately I cannot legally build another apartment in these spaces), or purchase a three family.

The pros of the two family are that the inventory is higher than the three family (but still low), and the cost will be lower than a three family; furthermore, the very low three family inventory drives up bidding and the risk of overpaying. The con of the two family is less cash-flow, from only one rent, although this could be improved with expansion.

Purchasing a two family in good structural shape, but possibly outdated, will be tight using my personal savings to cover the 20% down-payment and closing costs. I will not be able to purchase a three family in similar condition without a family loan to help cover the 20% down and closing. So in the two family case I will be financially extended to the limit, and in the second case, I'll be extended beyond.

As a rough estimate, the three family cash flow should cover my mortgage and taxes, but in addition, I would have to pay back a family loan and it might be tight to have a cash reserve. The two family cash flow will not fully cover my full mortgage, but may come close after expanding. Plus of course there will be expansion costs, which I could personally finance after regenerating some savings with time.

What investment would you make in my position? I'm open to other ideas as well.

Thanks.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

16,433
Posts
12,718
Votes
Ned Carey
  • Investor
  • Baltimore, MD
12,718
Votes |
16,433
Posts
Ned Carey
  • Investor
  • Baltimore, MD
ModeratorReplied

You may not need to put down 20% for an owner occupied 2 or 3 unit. I would prefer 3, or If I could find one that I could pull off, even a 4 unit. More units allows you to leverage the advantageous financing you can get for owner occupied.

Just as important however is, "how good is the deal?" I'd would take a great deal on a 2 unit before a lousy deal on a three or four unit.

Welcome to Bigger Pockets - Ned

  • Ned Carey
  • Loading replies...