Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

5
Posts
1
Votes
Jonathan Avalos
  • New to Real Estate
  • Raleigh, NC
1
Votes |
5
Posts

Vacant vs Occupied: Purchasing first quadplex

Jonathan Avalos
  • New to Real Estate
  • Raleigh, NC
Posted

Hi everyone,

My name is Jon Avalos, first time posting, working on purchasing my first investment property.

I've narrowed my search down to tri/quadplexes. However, I'm wondering what other investors have experienced when purchasing a vacant MF home? In your experience, what were some of the reasons the property was fully vacant? Did this serve as more of an advantage or disadvantage for your strategy? How long did it take to get all units rented? 

Ideally, I would like the property to be vacant so I can do the remodel work myself and potentially attract higher quality tenants. But if the property was completely vacant or trashed, is this a better indicator of the quality of tenants in the area or the quality of the prior property manager/owner?


Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated, thanks!

Loading replies...