Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 12 years ago,

User Stats

707
Posts
269
Votes
Jason Merchey
  • Investor
  • Hendersonville, NC
269
Votes |
707
Posts

Tenants from the Lower End of the Spectrum

Jason Merchey
  • Investor
  • Hendersonville, NC
Posted

Let's say I had $200,000 to invest (200 being the median in my area), and I decided to buy two, $100k SFDs instead of one $200k one. Is that a decent idea if you can get the same or more rent by doing it that way? Or do you think that someone who is paying $800 instead of $1500 in rent is going to be much more trouble and harder to find and this or that compared to the next tenant up in the price scale?

Loading replies...