Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago, 04/02/2020

User Stats

55
Posts
18
Votes
Hans M.
  • Investor
  • St. Louis, MO
18
Votes |
55
Posts

Do I Need to Use My Pet Fee For Damages Pet Does To Property?

Hans M.
  • Investor
  • St. Louis, MO
Posted
I have a tenant moving out, and the dogs tore up a lot of the grass in the front yard, so I will have to have that repaired. My understanding is that the cost for those repairs should come out of the tenant's security deposit, not the $200 non-refundable pet fee (not deposit!) charged up front. I also have this clause (thank you Brandon Turner!) in my Pet Addendum: "Tenant will perform regular housekeeping duties, including sweeping and vacuuming, clean up all waste, and assume all responsibility and cost for any damages, cleaning, replacements or any other expense to the property that are a result of the animal." So, am I correct about that, or not?

Loading replies...