Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

14
Posts
2
Votes
Serdar C.
2
Votes |
14
Posts

peerstreet vs FTF vs patch of land (POL) returns

Serdar C.
Posted

I think it will be very beneficial for everybody if everyone shares their annualized returns and capital losses if there was any and the percentage loss. Peerstreet publishes their stat to great extent, but not Fund that flip (no stat about capital loss) or patch of land. let's get enough data from everyone to create our own stat.

I will start.

Peer Street

Investor since 10/2018

invested mostly in 5% cash offer loans and just recently started investing in rehab loans.

annualized return: 4.7%

Fundthatflip.

I started investing in FTF couple of months ago. No stat to share yet.

Patch of land

I did not invest in this one yet. I read about POL having more defaults lately. I just want to investigate further before investing.

Loading replies...