Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

16
Posts
5
Votes
Christopher Guerriero
  • saddle brook, NJ
5
Votes |
16
Posts

LLC for rental houses, but houses not purchased under the LLC

Christopher Guerriero
  • saddle brook, NJ
Posted

I own 3 rental houses in New Jersey that were purchased through personal mortgages in my name. My accountant has directed me to form an LLC for each house so she could write off the losses and carry over the loss to my personal tax return, which apparently is not possible without an LLC over multiple years. My first question is whether or not simply forming an LLC is enough to write off the house through said LLC. I would be 100% owner of the LLC but seeing as the property is still not in the LLC's name, I am not certain that I am entitled to claiming the house as an instrument of the business, also any protections from the LLC dealing with seperation of the properties seems to be void in this case. Please let me know if anybody has any experience with this. Thanks

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,782
Posts
1,019
Votes
Michael Seeker
  • Investor
  • Louisville and Memphis, TN
1,019
Votes |
1,782
Posts
Michael Seeker
  • Investor
  • Louisville and Memphis, TN
Replied

@Christopher Guerriero - I would suggest doing some research on what this accountant has said. First of all, a sole member LLC is generally a disregarded entity and therefore treated the same as the individual for tax purposes. Second, an LLC for each property is typically a complex way to waste money (added liability insurance for a single LLC tends to be a much more cost effective approach for limiting liability). Third, if the LLC's do not own the properties then their liability protection is completely useless.

It sounds like the accountant has suggested something that would result in their ability to charge you the highest fees for what is otherwise a not very complex setup.

Maybe try and find another accountant...

Loading replies...