Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

3
Posts
0
Votes
Maria Tran
0
Votes |
3
Posts

Do landlords have to pay for a reverse osmosis filter sustem?

Maria Tran
Posted

Hello,

My renter just sent me an invoice for a reverse osmosis water system and installation fee.  I previously had a water filter connected to the fridge but had no such water system.  He chose to install it on his own and unfortunately, the lease does not spell out whose responsibility this is.  

Any advice on whether this is my responsibility or the Tenant’s?  He installed it without my knowledge and consent so it seems fair that I shouldn’t have to pay for it.  

Appreciate your input!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,096
Posts
943
Votes
Jennifer T.
  • Investor
  • New Orleans, LA
943
Votes |
1,096
Posts
Jennifer T.
  • Investor
  • New Orleans, LA
Replied

That is completely bizarre the tenant thinks they can put in a reverse osmosis system...especially considering the house didn't have one to begin with...and that you should be responsible for paying for it.  I assume you knew nothing about it and never agreed to that.

I swear!  Some people just live in an alternate reality from the rest of us.

I'd tell the tenant you did not authorize or agree to pay for an RO system.  I'd also mention that he is welcome to take it with him for whenever he moves out, as long as the sink/plumbing is fully returned to its previous condition.

Edited to add: In regards to it not being addressed one way or another in your lease.  Of course it isn't addressed.  Because an RO system didn't exist before.  To give an exaggerated analogy.  That would be like my tenant taking it upon himself to spend $40K to put a pool in the backyard.  And then tell me I'm responsible for the cost of the pool and for maintaining the pool.  It's not like, "whelp, he's got me there, because I didn't write anything in the lease about a pool and pool maintenance."

I realize you mentioned something about a filtered water line to the fridge that no longer works.  One could argue you are responsible for replacing that.  But an RO system is totally different.

  • Jennifer T.
  • Loading replies...