Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago,

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
Marion Ashmore
0
Votes |
2
Posts

PM Charging New Lease Fee for Previous Co-Tenant

Marion Ashmore
Posted

The original tenants in our out of state rental property signed as co-tenants, both names are on the original lease. After a few years, one of the tenant has decided to move out and the other tenant will be remaining. We just got paperwork last month with lease paperwork with the remaining tenants signature only, and were shocked when the statement from the first month during this lease term had a $3 rental payment instead of the normal $1500. The new lease fee structure from our PM is one month's rent for new lease and $250 for lease renewal, the latter of which is what we were expecting to have deducted.

If the tenant's name is on both leases and the PM didn't have to do any work to find a new tenant, shouldn't it just be the renewal fee? The lease agreement between ourselves and the PM company are vague and only specify that it is a one month's rent fee for new lease and $250 for a renewal. Since the only change to the lease was the removal of one of the parties, is it normal to create a whole new lease and charge a fee like this?

We've had lots of issues with this PM- horrible communication, questionable charges without receipts and not notifying us of maintenance that needed to be done with the property and we would have willingly fired them a long time ago aside from the ungodly amount written into our contract to break the lease. We were naive when we signed it and didn't build more protections and terms into our side to make sure we were able to hold our PM accountable.

I'm starting to wonder if litigation or the threatening of so might be a viable option, since the PM doesn't respond to text, email or phone calls without a half a dozen attempts at this point. Any advice for this point forward would be extremely helpful and is greatly appreciated.

Loading replies...