Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

298
Posts
232
Votes
Jeshua Patrick
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Charlotte, NC
232
Votes |
298
Posts

Looking at employment time for moving tenants

Jeshua Patrick
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Charlotte, NC
Posted

One of my requirements on a rental I have listed is 1 year of employment in current job. I have a couple potential applicants who are moving to the area and reached out about my property. My question for those with similar requirements is how do you treat a change in job that occurs during or will occur as a direct result of a tenant signing a lease for your property? I feel like this would be a disqualifier since they would effectively have 0 months in their current job at time of taking possession of my property. Am I wrong in how I am looking at it? What are the risks of taking on a transitioning tenant in your opinion?

Loading replies...