Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago,

User Stats

308
Posts
217
Votes
Nic S.
Pro Member
  • Danville. CA
217
Votes |
308
Posts

Property Manager Accountability

Nic S.
Pro Member
  • Danville. CA
Posted

Here’s a question I could use clarity on.

I'm on the cusp of working with a TK provider who is responsible for sourcing, vetting, and placing tenants in my SFH.

They offer a 1 year warranty on any work they performed to the property. They will replace or fix any damage within the 1st year UNLESS caused by “an act of GOD” or “tenant caused”.

My knee-jerk reaction is that “tenant caused” damage should be the responsibility of the company sourcing, vetting, and placing the tenant. *within the 1st year warranty* if their tenant blows a hole through the roof in the 1st year, I should not be responsible.

Anyone working with property managers or TK see a clause like this? What do you think?