Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 12 years ago,

User Stats

1,029
Posts
380
Votes
Jake Kucheck
  • Residential Real Estate Agent
  • Costa Mesa, CA
380
Votes |
1,029
Posts

A Hopefully Non-Provocative 2% Rule Question

Jake Kucheck
  • Residential Real Estate Agent
  • Costa Mesa, CA
Posted

Not trying to stir up the nest, just looking for an answer.

Obviously in the OC, I never think about the 2% rule. But... starting to look out of state, I was looking to clarify the following:

I know that the 2% rule states that if your monthly rent is 2% of your purchase price, the property has a good chance of cash flowing. My question is- is it supposed to be 2% of your purchase price, or 2% of your purchase price + repairs. Seems like the total acquisition cost (inclusive of repairs) would be a better number for determining your C on C.

Loading replies...