Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago,

User Stats

275
Posts
173
Votes
Ed W.
  • Investor / Landlord
  • Columbus, OH
173
Votes |
275
Posts

Multi-Year Residential Leases

Ed W.
  • Investor / Landlord
  • Columbus, OH
Posted

I'm a pretty experienced landlord in Ohio.  Based on Ohio law, I've never found any reason to have a lease term longer than a year.  My typical arrangements are either a 1 year term that becomes a month-to-month lease at the end of the initial term or a month-to-month lease from the very start.  These arrangements have worked well for me and I have relatively low turnover.

A friend in Missouri who has been a tenant in a single family property for a number of years without lateness paying rent or other incident, is telling me that their landlord is requiring a new lease for a minimum term of 5 years.  For the life of me, I don't understand how that helps a landlord.  Even if the market for rental housing is tight and tenants are lining up outside the landlord's units begging to move in - at least in Ohio - if a tenant has to break a lease the landlord is likely to get only the security deposit (though they are often entitled to more) and the landlord has an affirmative obligation to mitigate the damages by making a good faith effort to lease the unit.  In our current market, most units would be leased within 30 days so the landlord would only get the security deposit and not be able to sue for the rents based on whatever number of months and years remain on the lease.  In a slow market the landlord might have the right to collect months of rent but the cost of successfully suing and collecting usually is not worth the effort.

Other than some value in psychologically tying some limited number of tenants to the rental unit, what, if anything, is the value of a multi-year lease?  Is there something peculiar to Missouri law that makes this truly (vs. marginally) advantageous to landlords?  In a market where there are more housing units available than tenants who want them, multi-year leases - on average - would probably move slower than those with 1 year leases. 

Your thoughts on this are appreciated.

Loading replies...